<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RMB 1.5 trillion in new Chinese lending &#8212; can we turn this thing off?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/</link>
	<description>China's financial and monetary links to the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:24:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Balcony Box - Back to the future?</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>The Balcony Box - Back to the future?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>[...] Though I&#8217;m not a macro economist, this seems plausible: if individuals are cutting consumption to rebuild their balance sheets and corporations are cutting investment in the face of slack demand, then the money forced into the system by the central banks has few places to go.  Of course, the article also notes that China is expanding the money supply so rapidly that new bubbles seem a virtual certainty.  As usual, Michael Pettis has the details. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though I&#8217;m not a macro economist, this seems plausible: if individuals are cutting consumption to rebuild their balance sheets and corporations are cutting investment in the face of slack demand, then the money forced into the system by the central banks has few places to go.  Of course, the article also notes that China is expanding the money supply so rapidly that new bubbles seem a virtual certainty.  As usual, Michael Pettis has the details. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I was wrong about China&#8217;s prospects &#187; Doctor Recommended</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>I was wrong about China&#8217;s prospects &#187; Doctor Recommended</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>[...] estate trip in China (Pettis) - RMB 15 trillion in new Chinese lending, can we turn this thing off (Pettis) - China: Bogus Boom? (AEI) - Beijing Borrows $8.8 Billion for Financial District (Bloomberg) - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] estate trip in China (Pettis) &#8211; RMB 15 trillion in new Chinese lending, can we turn this thing off (Pettis) &#8211; China: Bogus Boom? (AEI) &#8211; Beijing Borrows $8.8 Billion for Financial District (Bloomberg) &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bubble that is China &#187; Blog for Trading Success</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2646</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bubble that is China &#187; Blog for Trading Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2646</guid>
		<description>[...] this to China where the banks have lent a reputed 7.4 Trillion yuan - more than the budgeted 5.6 trillion. Austrian economics says that if you inflate the money supply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this to China where the banks have lent a reputed 7.4 Trillion yuan &#8211; more than the budgeted 5.6 trillion. Austrian economics says that if you inflate the money supply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seven Notes on the China Wildcard</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTradingReport &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seven Notes on the China Wildcard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>[...] Pettis seems to think so, and I rely on his insights: RMB 1.5 trillion in new Chinese lending &#8212; can we turn this thing off?  and, I wasn&#8217;t impressed by China&#8217;s high reserve and GDP growth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pettis seems to think so, and I rely on his insights: RMB 1.5 trillion in new Chinese lending &mdash; can we turn this thing off?  and, I wasn&rsquo;t impressed by China&rsquo;s high reserve and GDP growth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger J</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>Prof. Pettis,

There are a number of skeptic views regarding China. Among the most interesting is by Hugh Hendry, a famed British hedge fund manager. He views China as a deep &amp; out-of-the-money call option on US GDP growth.

His skepticism is expressed in these interviews:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdbUAX_y9jk&amp;feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl_Uiv89Tck&amp;feature=related

and his claims on Chinese-induced commodity boom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AWD-05oRTc&amp;feature=related

Furthermore, there are also interesting views that China is actually now panicking... hence the trash-talks about the dollar &amp; new world reserve currency (although there were many more fortunate times to do this, if it really was China&#039;s goal), and the phenomenal boom in lending.

One summary of those views is this:
http://www.howestreet.com/articles_as_pdf/2009Jul101124bsccc071009.pdf

How much in agreement are you with these views? Perhaps you have more good points to add to the issue? Thanks in advance for your insights.


Best regards,
Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Pettis,</p>
<p>There are a number of skeptic views regarding China. Among the most interesting is by Hugh Hendry, a famed British hedge fund manager. He views China as a deep &amp; out-of-the-money call option on US GDP growth.</p>
<p>His skepticism is expressed in these interviews:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdbUAX_y9jk&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdbUAX_y9jk&amp;feature=related</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl_Uiv89Tck&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl_Uiv89Tck&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>and his claims on Chinese-induced commodity boom:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AWD-05oRTc&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AWD-05oRTc&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Furthermore, there are also interesting views that China is actually now panicking&#8230; hence the trash-talks about the dollar &amp; new world reserve currency (although there were many more fortunate times to do this, if it really was China&#8217;s goal), and the phenomenal boom in lending.</p>
<p>One summary of those views is this:<br />
<a href="http://www.howestreet.com/articles_as_pdf/2009Jul101124bsccc071009.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.howestreet.com/articles_as_pdf/2009Jul101124bsccc071009.pdf</a></p>
<p>How much in agreement are you with these views? Perhaps you have more good points to add to the issue? Thanks in advance for your insights.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houhui</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Houhui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>This site is now blocked in China</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site is now blocked in China</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Filtering &#124; ETF Fool</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Filtering &#124; ETF Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>[...] 1.5 trillion in new Chinese lending [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1.5 trillion in new Chinese lending [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pettis Banking Theorem &#124; But Then What</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pettis Banking Theorem &#124; But Then What</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>[...] is from Michael Pettis&#8217;s China Financial Markets. It should probably be like the Pledge of Allegiance used to be in school, a required recitation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is from Michael Pettis&#8217;s China Financial Markets. It should probably be like the Pledge of Allegiance used to be in school, a required recitation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archive &#187; Don’t Quote Me (On Bad Loans)&#124; China Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-2/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Archive &#187; Don’t Quote Me (On Bad Loans)&#124; China Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>[...] Our quote comes from Michel Pettis, a professor at Guanghua School of Management, via his blog, China Financial Markets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Our quote comes from Michel Pettis, a professor at Guanghua School of Management, via his blog, China Financial Markets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China to Switch Off Bubble-Blowing Machine? &#124; MORTGAGES</title>
		<link>http://mpettis.com/2009/07/rmb-15-trillion-in-new-chinese-lending-can-we-turn-this-thing-off/comment-page-1/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>China to Switch Off Bubble-Blowing Machine? &#124; MORTGAGES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mpettis.com/?p=566#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>[...] expert Michael Pettis writes:   Today bank stocks were down, on rumors that the very high and clearly unsustainable loan growth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expert Michael Pettis writes:   Today bank stocks were down, on rumors that the very high and clearly unsustainable loan growth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
